Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Aaron Morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>wrote: > If you have two nodes, and RF 2, you will only be able to use eventual > consistency. If you want to have stronger consistency and some redundancy 3 > nodes is the minimum requirement. > > In the current setup, with only 2 nodes, I would use RAID 10 as it > requires less operator intervention and there is a chance of data loss with > RF 2. If a write (including the hints) is only committed to one node and > the disk on that node fails the write will be lost. > > Hope that helps. > > > ----------------- > Aaron Morton > New Zealand > @aaronmorton > > Co-Founder & Principal Consultant > Apache Cassandra Consulting > http://www.thelastpickle.com > > On 11/12/2013, at 9:33 pm, Veysel Taşçıoğlu <veysel.tascio...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > What about using JBOD and replication factor 2? > > Regards. > On 11 Dec 2013 02:03, "cem" <cayiro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I need to setup 2 nodes Cassandra cluster. I know that Datastax >> recommends using JBOD as a disk configuration and have replication for the >> redundancy. I was planning to use RAID 10 but using JBOD can save 50% disk >> space and increase the performance . But I am not sure I should use JBOD >> with 2 nodes cluster since there is a higher chance to lose 50% of our >> cluster compare to a larger cluster. I may prefer to have stronger nodes if >> I have limited number of nodes. >> >> >> What do you think about that? Is there anyone who has 2 nodes cluster? >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Cem >> > >