Hi,

I am new to Cassandra Environment, does the order of the ring matter, as
long as the member joins the group?

Yogi


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:

> Please include the output of "nodetool ring", otherwise no one can help
> you.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Narendra Sharma <
> narendra.sha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Any pointers? I am planning to do rolling restart of the cluster nodes to
>> see if it will help.
>> On Jan 15, 2014 2:59 PM, "Narendra Sharma" <narendra.sha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> RF=3.
>>> On Jan 15, 2014 1:18 PM, "Andrey Ilinykh" <ailin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> what is the RF? What does nodetool ring show?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Narendra Sharma <
>>>> narendra.sha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for the odd subject but something is wrong with our cassandra
>>>>> ring. We have a 9 node ring as below.
>>>>>
>>>>> N1 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N2 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N3 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N4 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N5 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N6 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N7 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N8 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N9 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>>
>>>>> Using random partitioner and simple snitch. Cassandra 1.1.6 in AWS.
>>>>>
>>>>> I added a new node with token that is exactly in middle of N6 and N7.
>>>>> So the ring displayed as following
>>>>> N1 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N2 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N3 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N4 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N5 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N6 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N6.5 - UP/JOINING
>>>>> N7 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N8 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>> N9 - UP/NORMAL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that N6.5 is streaming from N1, N2, N6 and N7. I expect it
>>>>> to steam from (worst case) N5, N6, N7, N8. What could potentially cause 
>>>>> the
>>>>> node to get confused about the ring?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Narendra Sharma
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> *http://www.aeris.com <http://www.aeris.com>*
>>>>> *http://narendrasharma.blogspot.com/
>>>>> <http://narendrasharma.blogspot.com/>*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> --
> Jon Haddad
> http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
> skype: rustyrazorblade
>

Reply via email to