That does sound like a bug. Would you mind opening a JIRA (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA) ticket for it?


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I would try a fetch size other then 1. Cassandras slices are start
> inclusive so maybe that is a bug.
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014, Katsutoshi <nagapad.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I am using Cassandra 2.0.5 version. If null is explicitly set to a
> column, paging_state will not work. My test procedure is as follows:
> >
> > ------
> > create a table and insert 10 records using cqlsh. the query is as
> follows:
> >
> >     cqlsh:test> CREATE TABLE mytable (id int, range int, value text,
> PRIMARY KEY (id, range));
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range) VALUES (0, 0);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range) VALUES (0, 1);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range) VALUES (0, 2);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range) VALUES (0, 3);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range) VALUES (0, 4);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range, value) VALUES (0, 5,
> null);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range, value) VALUES (0, 6,
> null);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range, value) VALUES (0, 7,
> null);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range, value) VALUES (0, 8,
> null);
> >     cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO mytable (id, range, value) VALUES (0, 9,
> null);
> >
> > select data using datastax driver. the pseudocode is as follows:
> >
> >     Statement statement =
> QueryBuilder.select().from("mytable").setFetchSize(1);
> >     ResultSet rs = session.execute(statement);
> >     for(Row row : rs){
> >         System.out.println(String.format("id=%s, range=%s, value=%s",
> >             row.getInt("id"), row.getInt("range"),
> row.getString("value")));
> >     }
> >
> > the result is as follows:
> >
> >     id=0, range=0, value=null
> >     id=0, range=1, value=null
> >     id=0, range=2, value=null
> >     id=0, range=3, value=null
> >     id=0, range=4, value=null
> >     id=0, range=5, value=null
> >     id=0, range=7, value=null
> >     id=0, range=9, value=null
> > ------
> >
> > Result is 8 records although 10 records were expected. Does anyone has a
> similar issue?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Katsutoshi
> >
>
> --
> Sorry this was sent from mobile. Will do less grammar and spell check than
> usual.
>

Reply via email to