Sure it can be done, you can submit them a pull request. I'm sure they'll be happy to merge it.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:59 PM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote: > But won't it be nice if the API just provides a method to do so more > efficiently since it is easily possible? This is not a big deal for API. > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:11 PM, DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "so if I need to add a same column to 1000 rows, it creates the column >> object 100 times" --> is it really an issue ? Even if Astyanax creates 1 >> millions of column objects, as long as they die young and respect the >> generational hypothesis of the JVM, it's fine. >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:05 PM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> With Hector I used to create a column object once & add that to multiple >>> row mutations but with Astyanax it creates a new column object for each row >>> mutation in a mutation batch so if I need to add a same column to 1000 >>> rows, it creates the column object 100 times. Isn't there a better way to >>> add same column to multiple rows more efficiently ? Probably I should be >>> able to create a column object once & be able to add that to multiple row >>> mutations via Astyanax. >>> >>> I have several scenario in my app where I am doing this sort of >>> mutations. >>> >> >> >
