On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Bram Avontuur <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, that seems right. Doesn't look too bad, but I'll keep an eye on it. > Thanks. > I feel obligated to say that RF=N=2 is an unusual and probably degenerate configuration of Cassandra I have never heard of people operating before. There are meaningful features of Cassandra which are not available with RF and N <3. At the very least, this mode of operation is not the mode of operation which was assumed by the people who coded Cassandra. FWIW! =Rob
