Hi Ajay, My understanding is this,If you have a cluster of 3 nodes with replication factor of 3 , then the latency has more roll in throughput. It the cluster size is 6 with replication factor or 3 and if you are using multithreaded client, then the latency remain same and you will get better throughput.(Not because of 6 node but because of 6 nodes and multiple threads). Thanks & Regards Job M Thomas Platform & Technology Mob : 7560885748
________________________________ From: Ajay [mailto:ajay.ga...@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 12/26/2014 11:57 AM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Throughput Vs Latency Thanks Thomas for the clarification. If I use the Consistency level of QUORUM for Read and Write, the Latency would affect the Throughput right? Thanks Ajay On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Job Thomas <j...@suntecgroup.com> wrote: Hi, First of all,the write latency of cassandra is not high(Read is high). The high throughput is achieved through distributes read and write. Your doubt ( If Latency is more how come the Throughput is high ) is some what right if you put high consistency to both read and write. You will get distributed abilities since it is not Master/Slave architecture(Like HBase). If your consistency is lesser,then some nodes out of all replica nodes are free and will be used for another read/write . [ Think you are using multithreaded application ] Thanks & Regards Job M Thomas Platform & Technology Mob : 7560885748 ________________________________ From: Ajay [mailto:ajay.ga...@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 12/26/2014 10:46 AM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Throughput Vs Latency Hi, I am new to No SQL (and Cassandra). As I am going through few articles on Cassandra, it says Cassandra achieves highest throughput among various No SQL solutions but at the cost of high read and write latency. I have a basic question here - (If my understanding is right) Latency means the time taken to accept input, process and respond back. If Latency is more how come the Throughput is high? Thanks Ajay
<<winmail.dat>>
