No. as shown in the histograms, 99% of reads are using 2 or less number of tables. What's typical usually? Can anyone share from experience?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Duncan Sands <duncan.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20/03/15 19:34, Pranay Agarwal wrote: > >> The cluster is processing something like 12k reads and 2k writes/seconds. >> The >> disks are locally attached and latency is just fine. It's the number of >> disk >> iops that's too high. >> > > Maybe each read is accessing many sstables. > > Ciao, Duncan. >
