On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Amlan Roy <amlan....@cleartrip.com> wrote:
> Replication factor is 2. > It is relatively unusual for people to use a replication factor of 2, for what it's worth. =Rob
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Amlan Roy <amlan....@cleartrip.com> wrote:
> Replication factor is 2. > It is relatively unusual for people to use a replication factor of 2, for what it's worth. =Rob