Hi Aeljami,

thanks for the ticket. I'll keep an eye on it.

I can't get the survey to work at all on 2.0 (I am not getting any schema
on the survey node). So I guess the survey is not going to be a solution
for now.

kind regards,
Christian


On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, <aeljami....@orange.com> wrote:

> I had problems with write_survey.
>
> I opened a bug :  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9934
>
>
>
> *De :* horschi [mailto:hors...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* mardi 4 août 2015 15:20
> *À :* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Objet :* Re: auto_bootstrap=false broken?
>
>
>
> Hi Paulo,
>
>
>
> thanks for your feedback, but I think this is not what I am looking for.
>
>
>
> Starting with join_ring does not take any tokens in the ring. And the
> "nodetool join" afterwards will again do token-selection and data loading
> in one step.
>
>
>
> I would like to separate these steps:
>
> 1. assign tokens
>
> 2. have the node in a joining state, so that I can copy in data
>
> 3. mark the node as ready
>
>
>
>
>
> I just saw that perhaps write_survey could be misused for that.
>
>
>
> Did anyone ever use write_survey for such a partial bootstrapping?
>
> Do I have to worry about data-loss when using multiple write_survey nodes
> in one cluster?
>
>
>
> kind regards,
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Paulo Motta <pauloricard...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Christian,
>
> You may use the start-up parameter -Dcassandra.join_ring=false if you
> don't want the node to join the ring on startup. More about this parameter
> here:
> http://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.0/cassandra/tools/toolsCUtility_t.html
>
> You can later join the ring via nodetool join command:
> http://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.0/cassandra/tools/toolsJoin.html
>
> auto_bootstrap=false is typically used to bootstrap new datacenters or
> clusters, or nodes with data already on it before starting the process.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paulo
>
>
>
> 2015-08-04 8:50 GMT-03:00 horschi <hors...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I'll just ask my question as provocative as possible ;-)
>
>
>
> Isnt't auto_bootstrap=false broken the way it is currently implemented?
>
>
>
> What currently happens:
>
> New node starts with auto_bootstrap=false and it starts serving reads
> immediately without having any data.
>
>
>
> Would the following be more correct:
>
> - New node should stay in a joining state
>
> - Operator loads data (e.g. using nodetool rebuild or putting in backupped
> files or whatever)
>
> - Operator has to manually switch from joining into normal state using
> nodetool (only then it will start serving reads)
>
>
>
> Wouldn't this behaviour more consistent?
>
>
>
> kind regards,
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>

Reply via email to