Definitely 2:

https://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureInternals
http://www.slideshare.net/grro/cassandra-by-example-the-path-of-read-and-write-requests

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Laing, Michael <michael.la...@nytimes.com>
wrote:

>
> https://academy.datastax.com/courses/ds201-cassandra-core-concepts/internal-architecture-replication
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Laing, Michael <
> michael.la...@nytimes.com> wrote:
>
>> 2 is more correct.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:48 AM, ibrahim El-sanosi <
>> ibrahimsaba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear folks,
>>>
>>>
>>> I have doubt on how Cassandra performs a write request; I have two
>>> scenarios, please read them and ensure which one is correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> Assume we have cluster consists of 4 nodes N1, N2, N3, and N4. As
>>> Cassandra distributes the nodes in ring topology, the nodes links as
>>> following:
>>>
>>> N-->N-->N3-->N4-->N1
>>>
>>> Also we have replication factor equal to 3 (RF=3), and consistency level
>>> equals to ALL (CL=ALL).
>>>
>>> Client sends write request, W, to coordinator, say N4. The partitioner
>>> has determined the primary node of W is N1.
>>>
>>> What will happen now?
>>>
>>>
>>> *Scenario 1**:* coordinator sends W to N1. Upon receiving W, N1 stores
>>> it locally (in commitLog and memtable, *please forget about internal
>>> process*) and acknowledges the coordinator N4. Then N1 sends a copy of
>>> W to N2 (because N2 is next node in ring from N1 prospective). Upon
>>> receiving W, N2 stores it locally and sends acknowledgement to N4. Then N2
>>> sends a copy of W to N3 (because N3 is next node in ring from N2
>>> prospective). Upon receiving W, N3 stores it locally and acknowledges the
>>> Coordinator N4. Finally as soon as coordinator, N4, receives an
>>> acknowledgement from all nodes (N1, N2, and N3), it replays to the client.
>>>
>>> Note that: if scenario 1 correct, then the latency will be 4 rounds (N4
>>> -->N1-->N2-->N3-->N4 ----client).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Scenario 2:*  coordinator, N4, broadcasts W to N1, N2, and N3 (N4-->N1,
>>> N4-->N2, N4-->N3). Then replicas (N1, N2, and N3) store W locally and
>>> acknowledge to N4.  When N4 receives all ACKs, it replays to client.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can anyone confirm which scenario is correct in Cassandra?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ibrahim
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to