I have seen this on other releases, on 2.2.x. The workaround is exactly
like yours,  some other system keyspaces also need similar changes.

I would say this is a benign bug.

Yabin

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jai Bheemsen Rao Dhanwada <
jaibheem...@gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks,
>
> This always works on 2.1.13 and 2.1.16 version but not on 3.0.8.
> definitely not a firewall issue
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:16 PM, sai krishnam raju potturi <
> pskraj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> we faced a similar issue earlier, but that was more related to firewall
>> rules. The newly added datacenter was not able to communicate with the
>> existing datacenters on the port 7000(inter-node communication). Your's
>> might be a different issue, but just saying.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Jai Bheemsen Rao Dhanwada <
>> jaibheem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I have single datacenter with 3 C* nodes and we are trying to expand the
>>> cluster to another region/DC. I am seeing the below error while doing a 
>>> "nodetool
>>> rebuild -- name_of_existing_data_center" .
>>>
>>> [user@machine ~]$ nodetool rebuild DC1
>>> nodetool: Unable to find sufficient sources for streaming range
>>> (-402178150752044282,-396707578307430827] in keyspace system_distributed
>>> See 'nodetool help' or 'nodetool help <command>'.
>>> [user@machine ~]$
>>>
>>> user@cqlsh> SELECT * from system_schema.keyspaces where
>>> keyspace_name='system_distributed';
>>>
>>>  keyspace_name | durable_writes | replication
>>> ---------------+----------------+---------------------------
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>  system_distributed |           True | {'class':
>>> 'org.apache.cassandra.locator.SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor':
>>> '3'}
>>>
>>> (1 rows)
>>>
>>> To overcome this I have updated system_distributed keyspace to DC1:3 and
>>> DC2:3 with NetworkTopologyStrategy
>>>
>>> C* Version - 3.0.8
>>>
>>> Is this a bug that is introduced in 3.0.8 version of cassandra? as I
>>> haven't seen this issue with the older versions?
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to