I have been using 3.0.x in moderate load production on a 8 node cluster since 3.0.5. I agree with start at 3.0.X. Starting a new project on a version that just reached end of life is very hard to justify in my mind.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016, 10:22 AM Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > I agree with everything you just said, Kai. I'd start a new project with > 3.0.10. I'd stay away from MVs though. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:19 AM Kai Wang <dep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just based on a few observations on this list. Not one week goes by > without people asking which release is the most stable on 3.x line. Folks > at instaclustr also provide their own 3.x fork for stability issues. etc > > We developers already have enough to think about. I really don't feel like > spending time researching which release of C* I should choose. So for me, > 2.2.x is the choice in production. > > That being said, I have nothing against 3.x. I do like its new storage > engine. If I start a brand new project today with zero previous C* > experience, I probably would choose 3.0.10 as my starting point. However if > I were to upgrade to 3.x, I would have to test it thoroughly in a dev > environment with real production load and monitor it very closely on > performance, compaction, repair, bootstrap, replacing etc. Data is simply > too important to take chances with. > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Shalom Sagges <shal...@liveperson.com> > wrote: > > Hey Kai, > > Thanks for the info. Can you please elaborate on the reasons you'd pick > 2.2.6 over 3.0? > > > Shalom Sagges > DBA > T: +972-74-700-4035 <+972%2074-700-4035> > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748> <http://twitter.com/liveperson> > <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We Create Meaningful Connections > > <https://engage.liveperson.com/idc-mobile-first-consumer/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=mkto&utm_campaign=idcsig> > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Kai Wang <dep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have been running 2.2.6 in production. As of today I would still pick it > over 3.x for production. > > On Nov 30, 2016 5:42 AM, "Shalom Sagges" <shal...@liveperson.com> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'm about to upgrade our 2.0.14 version to a newer 2.x version. > At first I thought of upgrading to 2.2.8, but I'm not sure how stable it > is, as I understand the 2.2 version was supposed to be a sort of beta > version for 3.0 feature-wise, whereas 3.0 upgrade will mainly handle the > storage modifications (please correct me if I'm wrong). > > So my question is, if I need a 2.x version (can't upgrade to 3 due to > client considerations), which one should I choose, 2.1.x or 2.2.x? (I'm > don't require any new features available in 2.2). > > Thanks! > > Shalom Sagges > DBA > T: +972-74-700-4035 <+972%2074-700-4035> > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/164748> <http://twitter.com/liveperson> > <http://www.facebook.com/LivePersonInc> We Create Meaningful Connections > > <https://engage.liveperson.com/idc-mobile-first-consumer/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=mkto&utm_campaign=idcsig> > > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of > the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this > message or any information herein. > If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender > immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you. > > > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of > the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this > message or any information herein. > If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender > immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you. > > > -- Luke Jolly Senior Site Reliability Engineer (850) 270-3243 <8502703243> l...@getadmiral.com getadmiral.com How much are you losing to adblockers? Find out for free with Admiral <http://getadmiral.com>.
