Could you please be more specific? Am 07.12.2016 17:10 schrieb "Voytek Jarnot" <voytek.jar...@gmail.com>:
> Should've mentioned - running 3.9. Also - please do not recommend MVs: I > tried, they're broken, we punted. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Voytek Jarnot <voytek.jar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The low default value for batch_size_warn_threshold_in_kb is making me >> wonder if I'm perhaps approaching the problem of atomicity in a non-ideal >> fashion. >> >> With one data set duplicated/denormalized into 5 tables to support >> queries, we use batches to ensure inserts make it to all or 0 tables. This >> works fine, but I've had to bump the warn threshold and fail threshold >> substantially (8x higher for the warn threshold). This - in turn - makes >> me wonder, with a default setting so low, if I'm not solving this problem >> in the canonical/standard way. >> >> Mostly just looking for confirmation that we're not unintentionally doing >> something weird... >> > >
