You should start with understanding your needs. Once you understand your need you can pick the software that fits your need. Staring with a software stack is backwards.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Ben Slater <ben.sla...@instaclustr.com> wrote: > I wasn’t familiar with Gizzard either so I thought I’d take a look. The > first things on their github readme is: > *NB: This project is currently not recommended as a base for new > consumers.* > (And no commits since 2013) > > So, Cassandra definitely looks like a better choice as your datastore for > a new project. > > Cheers > Ben > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 at 12:41 Manoj Khangaonkar <khangaon...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am not that familiar with gizzard but with gizzard + mysql , you have >> multiple moving parts in the system that need to managed separately. You'll >> need the mysql expert for mysql and the gizzard expert to manage the >> distributed part. It can be argued that long term this will have higher >> adminstration cost >> >> Cassandra's value add is its simple peer to peer architecture that is >> easy to manage - a single database solution that is distributed, scalable, >> highly available etc. In other words, once you gain expertise cassandra, >> you get everything in one package. >> >> regards >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Sikander Rafiq <hafiz_ra...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm exploring Cassandra for handling large data sets for mobile app, but >> i'm not clear where it stands. >> >> >> If we use MySQL as underlying database and Gizzard for building custom >> distributed databases (with arbitrary storage technology) and Memcached for >> highly queried data, then where lies Cassandra? >> >> >> As i have read that Twitter uses both Cassandra and Gizzard. Please >> explain me where Cassandra will act. >> >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Sikander >> >> >> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://khangaonkar.blogspot.com/ >> >
