Ok got it.

But it's interesting that this is supported:
DELETE/SELECT FROM ks.cf WHERE (pk1) IN ((1), (2), (3));

This is technically mostly the same (Token awareness, coordination/routing,
read performance, ...), right?

2017-02-09 10:43 GMT+01:00 Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>:

> This is a statement on multiple partitions and there is really no
> optimization the code internally does on that. In fact, I strongly advise
> you to not use a batch but rather simply do a for loop client side and send
> statement individually. That way, your driver will be able to use proper
> token-awareness for each request (while if you send a batch, one
> coordinator will be picked up and will have to forward most statement,
> doing more network hops at the end of the day). The only case where using a
> batch is indeed legit is if you care about all the statement being atomic,
> but in that case it's a logged batch you want.
>
> That's btw more or less why we never bothered implementing that: it's
> totally doable technically, but it's not really such a good idea
> performance wise in practice most of the time, and you can easily work it
> around with a batch if you need atomicity.
>
> Which is not saying it will never be and shouldn't be supported btw, there
> is something to be said for the consistency of the CQL language in general.
> But it's why no-one took time to do it so far.
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, thats the workaround - I'll try that.
>>
>> Would you agree it would be better for internal optimizations to process
>> this within a single statement?
>>
>> 2017-02-09 10:32 GMT+01:00 Ben Slater <ben.sla...@instaclustr.com>:
>>
>>> Yep, that makes it clear. I think an unlogged batch of prepared
>>> statements with one statement per PK tuple would be roughly equivalent? And
>>> probably no more complex to generate in the client?
>>>
>>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 at 20:22 Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe that makes it clear:
>>>>
>>>> DELETE FROM ks.cf WHERE (partitionkey1, partitionkey2) IN ((1, 2), (1,
>>>> 3), (2, 3), (3, 4));
>>>>
>>>> If want to delete or select a bunch of records identified by their
>>>> multi-partitionkey tuples.
>>>>
>>>> 2017-02-09 10:18 GMT+01:00 Ben Slater <ben.sla...@instaclustr.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Are you looking this to be equivalent to (PK1=1 AND PK2=2) or are you
>>>> looking for (PK1 IN (1,2) AND PK2 IN (1,2)) or something else?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 at 20:09 Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>
>>>> CQL says this is not allowed:
>>>>
>>>> DELETE FROM ks.cf WHERE (pk1, pk2) IN ((1, 2));
>>>>
>>>> 1. Is there a reason for it? There shouldn't be a performance penalty,
>>>> it is a PK lookup, the same thing works with a single pk column
>>>> 2. Is there a known workaround for it?
>>>>
>>>> It would be much of a help to have it for daily business, IMHO it's a
>>>> waste of resources to run multiple queries just to fetch a bunch of records
>>>> by a PK.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for any reply
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Benjamin Roth
>>>> Prokurist
>>>>
>>>> Jaumo GmbH · www.jaumo.com
>>>> Wehrstraße 46 · 73035 Göppingen · Germany
>>>> Phone +49 7161 304880-6 <+49%207161%203048806> · Fax +49 7161 304880-1
>>>> <+49%207161%203048801>
>>>> AG Ulm · HRB 731058 · Managing Director: Jens Kammerer
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ————————
>>>> Ben Slater
>>>> Chief Product Officer
>>>> Instaclustr: Cassandra + Spark - Managed | Consulting | Support
>>>> +61 437 929 798 <+61%20437%20929%20798>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Benjamin Roth
>>>> Prokurist
>>>>
>>>> Jaumo GmbH · www.jaumo.com
>>>> Wehrstraße 46 · 73035 Göppingen · Germany
>>>> Phone +49 7161 304880-6 <+49%207161%203048806> · Fax +49 7161 304880-1
>>>> <+49%207161%203048801>
>>>> AG Ulm · HRB 731058 · Managing Director: Jens Kammerer
>>>>
>>> --
>>> ————————
>>> Ben Slater
>>> Chief Product Officer
>>> Instaclustr: Cassandra + Spark - Managed | Consulting | Support
>>> +61 437 929 798 <+61%20437%20929%20798>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Benjamin Roth
>> Prokurist
>>
>> Jaumo GmbH · www.jaumo.com
>> Wehrstraße 46 · 73035 Göppingen · Germany
>> Phone +49 7161 304880-6 <+49%207161%203048806> · Fax +49 7161 304880-1
>> <+49%207161%203048801>
>> AG Ulm · HRB 731058 · Managing Director: Jens Kammerer
>>
>
>


-- 
Benjamin Roth
Prokurist

Jaumo GmbH · www.jaumo.com
Wehrstraße 46 · 73035 Göppingen · Germany
Phone +49 7161 304880-6 · Fax +49 7161 304880-1
AG Ulm · HRB 731058 · Managing Director: Jens Kammerer

Reply via email to