On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:29 PM Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> you often have to run repair after each increment - going from 3 -> 5 > means 3 -> 4, repair, 4 -> 5 - just going 3 -> 5 will violate consistency > guarantees, and is technically unsafe. > Jeff, How going from 3 -> 4 is *not violating* consistency guarantees already? Are you assuming quorum writes and reads and a perfectly repaired keyspace? Regards, -- Alex
