17ms read latency for the 50th percentile is actually a pretty high latency
in my experience, I prefer to see the 75th percentile read latency to be
around 1-2ms.  Of course it depends on your use case and what your
performance objectives are.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:05 AM Kane Wilson <k...@raft.so> wrote:

> It does imply the SSTables are being read - how big is your data size and
> how much memory on the nodes? It's certainly possible to get low latencies
> despite many SSTables, but I'd expect small read sizes paired with a lot of
> memory.
>
>
> raft.so - Cassandra consulting, support, managed services
>
> On Thu., 29 Apr. 2021, 08:44 Ayub M, <hia...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The table has 24 sstables with size tiered compaction, when I run
>> nodetool tablehistograms I see 99% percentile of the queries are showing up
>> 24 as the number of sstables. But the read latency is very low, my
>> understanding from the tableshistograms's sstable column is - it shows how
>> many sstables were read to complete the query. If so reading 24 sstables
>> should take sometime, at least maybe couple of seconds. Am I missing
>> something here? Does checking against index/bloom filters count towards
>> sstable counter as well?
>>
>> Percentile  SSTables     Write Latency      Read Latency    Partition Size   
>>      Cell Count
>>                               (micros)          (micros)           (bytes)
>> 50%            24.00             17.08          17436.92               310   
>>               6
>> 75%            24.00             24.60          20924.30               446   
>>               6
>> 95%            24.00             42.51          62479.63               770   
>>              10
>> 98%            24.00             51.01          74975.55              1597   
>>              17
>> 99%            24.00             61.21          74975.55              3311   
>>              24
>> Min            18.00              2.30           4866.32                87   
>>               0
>> Max            24.00            943.13          89970.66            545791   
>>           17084
>>
>>

Reply via email to