Thank you Jeff. Consider that if rack space is at a premium, what would
make the most sense?
-Joe
On 8/2/2021 2:46 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
IF you bought a server with that topology, you would definitely want
to run lots of instances, perhaps 24, to effectively utilize that disk
space.
You'd also need 24 IPs, and you'd need a NIC that could send/receive
24x the normal bandwidth. And the cost of rebuilding such a node
would be 24x higher than normal (so consider how many of those you'd
have in a cluster, and how often they'd fail).
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:06 AM Joe Obernberger
<joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
We have a large amount of data to be stored in Cassandra, and if
we were
to purchase new hardware in limited space, what would make the
most sense?
Dell has machines with 24, 8TByte drives in a 2u configuration. Given
Cassandra's limitations (?) to large nodes, would it make sense to
run
24 copies of Cassandra on that one node (one per drive)?
Thank you!
-Joe
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
