Just remove it from the seed list in the cassandra.yaml file and restart
the node.  Make sure that auto_bootstrap is set to true first though.

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:59 PM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So likely because I made it a seed node when I added it to the cluster it
> didn't do the bootstrap process. How can I recover this?
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:41 AM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes replication factor is 3.
>>
>> I ran nodetool repair -pr on all the nodes (one at a time) and am still
>> having issues getting data back from queries.
>>
>> I did make the new node a seed node.
>>
>> Re "rack4": I assumed that was just an indication as to the physical
>> location of the server for redundancy. This one is separate from the others
>> so I used rack4.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:30 AM Carlos Diaz <crdiaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm assuming that your replication factor is 3.  If that's the case, did
>>> you intentionally put this node in rack 4?  Typically, you want to add
>>> nodes in multiples of your replication factor in order to keep the "racks"
>>> balanced.  In other words, this node should have been added to rack 1, 2 or
>>> 3.
>>>
>>> Having said that, you should be able to easily fix your problem by
>>> running a nodetool repair -pr on the new node.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 8:16 PM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>> I recently added a node to my 3 node Cassandra 4.0.5 cluster and now
>>>> many reads are not returning rows! What do I need to do to fix this? There
>>>> weren't any errors in the logs or other problems that I could see. I
>>>> expected the cluster to balance itself but this hasn't happened (yet?). The
>>>> nodes are similar so I have num_tokens=256 for each. I am using the
>>>> Murmur3Partitioner.
>>>>
>>>> # nodetool status
>>>> Datacenter: dc1
>>>> ===============
>>>> Status=Up/Down
>>>> |/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving
>>>> --  Address          Load       Tokens  Owns (effective)  Host ID
>>>>                         Rack
>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.105  2.65 TiB   256     72.9%
>>>> afd02287-3f88-4c6f-8b27-06f7a8192402  rack3
>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.253  2.6 TiB    256     73.9%
>>>> e1af72be-e5df-4c6b-a124-c7bc48c6602a  rack2
>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.24   93.82 KiB  256     80.0%
>>>> c4e8b4a0-f014-45e6-afb4-648aad4f8500  rack4
>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.107  2.65 TiB   256     73.2%
>>>> ab72f017-be96-41d2-9bef-a551dec2c7b5  rack1
>>>>
>>>> # nodetool netstats
>>>> Mode: NORMAL
>>>> Not sending any streams.
>>>> Read Repair Statistics:
>>>> Attempted: 0
>>>> Mismatch (Blocking): 0
>>>> Mismatch (Background): 0
>>>> Pool Name                    Active   Pending      Completed   Dropped
>>>> Large messages                  n/a         0          71754         0
>>>> Small messages                  n/a         0        8398184        14
>>>> Gossip messages                 n/a         0        1303634         0
>>>>
>>>> # nodetool ring
>>>> Datacenter: dc1
>>>> ==========
>>>> Address               Rack        Status State   Load            Owns
>>>>              Token
>>>>
>>>>              9189523899826545641
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.24        rack4       Up     Normal  93.82 KiB       79.95%
>>>>              -9194674091837769168
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.107       rack1       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB        73.25%
>>>>              -9168781258594813088
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.253       rack2       Up     Normal  2.6 TiB         73.92%
>>>>              -9163037340977721917
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.105       rack3       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB        72.88%
>>>>              -9148860739730046229
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.107       rack1       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB        73.25%
>>>>              -9125240034139323535
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.253       rack2       Up     Normal  2.6 TiB         73.92%
>>>>              -9112518853051755414
>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.105       rack3       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB        72.88%
>>>>              -9100516173422432134
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> This is causing a serious production issue. Please help if you can.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to