Thanks, Werner for your response
But as i mentioned in my previous post, i've already tried a) :
it doesn't fix anything.
And b) doesn't change anything at all.
I invite you to make a test, with a TreeMap based on a Java Comparator
;-)
On 11/24/06, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
there's a few items you'll need to fix:
a) field mapping for "radios" should read ...
<field name=3D"radios" collection=3D"map">
b) Code to initialize the radios member in FormRadio should read ...
private Map radios = new TreeMap();
I hope this clarifies a few things
Werner
castor sylvain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I desperatly try to map a ordered TreeMap.
> (It works fine if this map is a basic HashMap)
>
> The mapping :
> [...]
> <class name="com.mycompany.myproduct.FormRadio">
> <field name="radios" collection="hashtable">
> <bind-xml name="radio">
> <class name="org.exolab.castor.mapping.MapItem">
> <field name="key" type="java.lang.String">
> <bind-xml name="key" node="attribute" />
> </field>
> <field name="value" type="java.lang.String">
> <bind-xml node="text"/>
> </field>
> </class>
> </bind-xml>
> </field>
> </class>
> [...]
>
>
> The class :
> import java.util.Map;
> public class FormRadio extends FormField {
> private Map radios = null;
> [...]
> public Map getRadios() {
> return radios;
> }
> public void setRadios(Map radios) {
> this.radios = radios;
> }
> }
>
>
> The "radios" map on FormRadio class is a TreeMap, based/ordered on a
> Java Comparator.
> It doesn't really fail, but the "value" fields of my TreeMap are not
> outputed.
> (only the keys are outputed in attribute, as specified).
>
> Even if i replace :
> 1) collection="hashtable" ... by : collection="map"
> 2) <bind-xml node="text"/> ... by : <bind-xml name="value"
> node="attribute"/>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any workaround, or any suggestion about a matching
> mapping file.
> ;-)
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
