Odd. But yes, it 'int' gives you what you desire, I am fine myself .. ;-).

Werner

PS If you feel like creating a Jira issue about this, feel free .. ;-.).

Karr, David wrote:
> Actually, I think you meant the following:
> 
>  <elementBinding name="/loanRiskRatingRequest/@modelVersion">
>   <member java-type="int" />
>  </elementBinding>
> 
> That produces what I'm looking for.
> 
> It might be useful to point out that what you gave me produces a very odd 
> result.  It changes the type of the variable, but it doesn't make it 
> "java.lang.Integer" as you specified, it actually makes it "java.lang.Long".  
> That can't be right.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:16 AM
>> To: user@castor.codehaus.org
>> Subject: AW: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer 
>> changed from int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
>>
>> Yes, and
>>
>> <elementBinding name="/loanRiskRatingRequest/@modelVersion">
>>      <member java-type="java.lang.Integer" /> </elementBinding>
>>
>> Should give you your desired behaviour.
>>
>> Werner
>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. März 2007 21:47
>>> An: user@castor.codehaus.org
>>> Betreff: RE: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer 
>> changed from 
>>> int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
>>>
>>> Is this all you mean?:
>>>
>>>   <xs:element name="loanRiskRatingRequest">
>>>     <xs:complexType>
>>>       <xs:sequence>
>>>         <xs:element ref="loanProperties"/>
>>>       </xs:sequence>
>>>       <xs:attribute name="modelVersion" use="optional" 
>> type="xs:integer"/>
>>>     </xs:complexType>
>>>   </xs:element>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:43 PM
>>>> To: user@castor.codehaus.org
>>>> Subject: AW: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer changed 
>>>> from int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
>>>>
>>>> Show me a XML schema fragment with an <xs:integer> typed element 
>>>> definition, and I'll provide the <elementBinding>.
>>>>
>>>> Werner
>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 06. März 2007 22:15
>>>>> An: user@castor.codehaus.org
>>>>> Betreff: RE: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer
>>>> changed from
>>>>> int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 12:25 PM
>>>>>> To: user@castor.codehaus.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [castor-user] Default binding of 
>> xs:integer changed 
>>>>>> from int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, it should be able to override this using a <member> 
>>>>>> element within an <*Binding>.
>>>>> From the examples on the web site, I don't see how exactly
>>>> this is done.
>>>>>> Werner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS Thanks for reading the release notes .. ;-)
>>>>> From my point of view, I can interpret this two ways, so
>>>> I'm not sure
>>>>> which one you meant.  If you really meant to thank me for
>>>> reading the
>>>>> release notes, then I'll say I didn't actually read them :) , I 
>>>>> determined this by trying the release.  If you mean that I
>>>> should have
>>>>> seen this in the release notes, how would I know where 
>> the release 
>>>>> notes are for this release?  I don't see any in an 
>> obvious place.
>>>>>> Karr, David wrote:
>>>>>>> I just tried the latest 1.1.1 snapshot this morning,
>>>> and now that
>>>>>>> other issues have been resolved, I'm now seeing that
>>>> the default
>>>>>>> binding of "xs:integer" changed from "int" to "long"
>>>>>> between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1.
>>>>>>> Why was this change made?  Can I override this in 
>> the binding 
>>>>>>> file, leaving it bound to "int"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>>>
>>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>>
>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>
>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to