I suppose.  In this case that will result in a binding file with several
hundred bindings. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralf Joachim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [castor-user] How to avoid too-long file names
> 
> It should be possible to rename the class with a binding file.
> 
> Ralf
> 
> 
> Karr, David schrieb:
> > Although the too-long file names create some annoyances, the big 
> > problem I have right now is that I get a bizarre compile 
> error when I 
> > try to compile it.  I see something like this (somewhat elided):
> > 
> >     [javac]
> > 
> ...\RealECXMLTransactionProductListProductAppraisalInfoPriceOpinionInf
> > oC
> > 
> omparisonPropertyListComparisonPropertyUnitBreakdownUnitList.java:57:
> > cannot access
> > 
> ...RealECXMLTransactionProductListProductAppraisalInfoPriceOpinionInfo
> > Co mparisonPropertyListComparisonPropertyUnitBreakdownUnitListUnit
> >     [javac] bad class file:
> > 
> ...\RealECXMLTransactionProductListProductAppraisalInfoPriceOpinionInf
> > oC 
> > 
> omparisonPropertyListComparisonPropertyUnitBreakdownUnitListUnit.class
> >     [javac] class file contains wrong class: java.util.Vector
> >     [javac] Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct 
> > subdirectory of the classpath.
> >     [javac]             final
> > 
> ...RealECXMLTransactionProductListProductAppraisalInfoPriceOpinionInfo
> > Co mparisonPropertyListComparisonPropertyUnitBreakdownUnitListUnit 
> > vUnit)
> >     [javac]                                                       ^
> >     [javac] 1 error
> > 
> > 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Karr, David
> >>Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:32 PM
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: [castor-user] How to avoid too-long file names
> >>
> >>I have a schema provided by a vendor that I have to 
> generate classes 
> >>for.  Because of its structure, it tends to create source 
> files that 
> >>are too long for DOS, which creates all kinds of annoyances.  It's 
> >>very deep in anonymous element-complexType components.  Is there 
> >>something I can do, without modifying the schema, and hopefully 
> >>without modifying the code that references the generated code (in 
> >>decreasing order of
> >>importance) so that it creates reasonably-sized names?
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >>
> >>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > 
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to