Before I reply to this, let me just ask why you don't generate Java classes from an (existing?) XML schema, and switch away from a mapping file based approach ?
Werner Josh Foure wrote: > Hi all, > I am trying to use Castor 1.0M4 as my binding framework inside of XFire > 1.2.6 but I am running into a namespace problem. I can reproduce the > problem using Castor 1.1 which is what I will describe now. I have a > Castor mapping file that defines the mapping for a class "order.Order" > in the "http://order <http://order/>" namespace. This order has an > orderNumber and 2 names. The names are of type "common.Name" which is > in the "http://common <http://common/>" namespace. The mapping file > looks as follows: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <mapping> > <class name="order.Order"> > <map-to xml="order" ns-uri="http://order <http://order/>" > ns-prefix="order"/> > <field name="orderNumber" type="integer"> > <bind-xml name="order-number" node="element"/> > </field> > <field name="sellerName" type="common.Name"> > <bind-xml name="seller-name" node="element"/> > </field> > <field name="buyerName" type="common.Name"> > <bind-xml name="buyer-name" node="element"/> > </field> > </class> > <class name="common.Name"> > <map-to xml="name" ns-uri="http://common <http://common/>" > ns-prefix="common"/> > <field name="firstName" type="java.lang.String"> > <bind-xml name="first-name" node="element"/> > </field> > <field name="lastName" type="java.lang.String"> > <bind-xml name="last-name" node="element"/> > </field> > </class> > </mapping> > > When I create an instance of Order and pass in an orderNumber and 2 > names, Castor generates the following XML: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <order:order xmlns:order="http://order <http://order/>"> > <order:order-number>1234</order:order-number> > <common:seller-name xmlns:common="http://common <http://common/>"> > <common:first-name>Bob</common:first-name> > <common:last-name>Smith</common:last-name> > </common:seller-name> > <common:buyer-name xmlns:common="http://common <http://common/>"> > <common:first-name>Fred</common:first-name> > <common:last-name>Peterson</common:last-name> > </common:buyer-name> > </order:order> > > The problem is that I cannot generate an XML schema for this (I want a > schema for my common types and another for the order). If my > seller-name and buyer-name complex types use the "type" attribute to > specify my common Name type, then the namespace of seller-name and > buyer-name should be "order" and not "common". If my complex types use > the "ref" attribute to point to a Name element in my common schema, then > I cannot change the name of the element from "name" to "buyer-name" and > "seller-name". Please let me know if I am missing something and there > is a way to have Castor generate XML in such a way that I can break out > the schemas. > > I am happy to reply back with the schema I would like to use but I did > not want to clutter up this initial email. > Thank you, > Josh > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. > Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48246/*http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE5cDF2bXZzBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW4tY2VudGVy> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
