This certainly does!  Thank you for taking the time to respond


Werner Guttmann wrote:
> 
> If you started with an XML schema, and used the XML code generator to
> generate the Java classes from the schema, you would define the content
> of the <FormData> element to be of type <xs:any/>.
> 
> As such, Castor would handle this through an AnyNode instance, which is
> actually a DOM-like representation of the XML unmarshalled.
> 
> Does this meet your needs ?
> 
> Regards
> Werner
> 
> Koku wrote:
>> In the xml I receive there is 'control' data with known tags.  There is
>> also
>> data that I don't care about, but need to pass along to a helper class. 
>> Is
>> there a way to unmarshall and marshall in such a way that I don't have to
>> have all the classes for all possible tags generated?  For example:
>> 
>> <FormInfo>
>>    <CommonInfo>
>>        <sessionId>12345</sessionId>
>>    <\CommonInfo>
>>    <FormData>
>>       ...
>>    <\FormData>
>> <\FormInfo>
>> 
>> In this simplified example, the tags in the FormData section could vary
>> greatly.  My processing does not access the data in that section, but
>> needs
>> to pass it to the next class.  Is there a way to marshall and unmarshall
>> this xml and not lose those tags (and associated data)?
>> 
>> Any ideas would be appreciated.  Thank you!
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Marshalling-and-Unmarshalling-tp17406736p17411124.html
Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to