Thomas,
a few questions:
a) How would you model an XML schema to allow bespoke functionality ?
b) Will the content of children always be valid XML, or mixed as well ?
Regards
Werner
Thomas Cherel wrote:
> Sorry, I should have provided the example in the first place.
>
> Let's say that I have the following Java class (getter/setter not included to
> make it short):
>
> class Person {
> String name;
> String children;
> }
>
> Let's now say that I create the following Person instance:
>
> Person p = new Person();
> p.setName("John Doe");
> p.setChildren("<name>Marie</name><name>Nolan></name>");
>
> When marshalling this instance into XML I'd like the XML document to look as
> follows:
>
> <person>
> <name>John Doe</name>
> <children>
> <name>Marie</name><name>Nolan</name>
> </children>
> </person>
>
> The children attribute is already XML and I want this XML to be included "as
> is" in the generated XML document.
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/26/09, Werner Guttmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Werner Guttmann <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [castor-user] "inject" custom XML in a generated XML
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Thursday, February 26, 2009, 3:35 PM
>> Thomas,
>>
>> before trying to provide you with a definitive answer, can
>> you please
>> give us a short example of what you are trying to do ?
>> Short, but
>> complete, pretty please.
>>
>> Regards
>> Werner
>>
>> Thomas Cherel wrote:
>>> I did not experiment yet the FieldHandler capability
>> but I was
>>> wondering if there is a way to use it to
>> "inject" custom XML in a
>>> generated XML doc from a java class.
>>>
>>> What I mean by that is having the ability to create my
>> own XML chunk
>>> for an attribute of a given Java class and have this
>> XML chunk
>>> inserted "as is" in the generated XML (and
>> being part of the overall
>>> XML, meaning without having any encoding of the XML
>> reserve
>>> characters).
>>>
>>> Based on the documentation it seems that I can
>> certainly create a
>>> string for any Java attribute (using a FieldHandler)
>> but I am
>>> assuming that if this string is an XML string, the XML
>> characters
>>> will be XML encoded (e.g. > instead of >)
>> before they are inserted
>>> in the generated XML. Am I correct and if I am, is
>> there a way to
>>> overwrite this behavior?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
