Hey Werner, so for answering the questions:
1) Are those classes by any chance part of a class hierarchy ? Yes they are in a class hirarchie, it can be found in the zip file of the last email. 2) Why would you want that just at this very location ? Why not let Castor decide if it's needed ? Again, a short example might be helpful. I want them in this very locations, because i must fit an european standard for exchange of health information. The XSD can be found here: http://pangea.upv.es/linkehr/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/en13606.zip Maybe I should generate the code out of it? 3) More specific example. So here we go. I just take 6 classes (included in the first email) which I want to combine: - RecordComponent with the attributes: - meaning : CV - name : SimpleText - Composition extends RecordComponent and no needed attributes for the example - DataValue with no attributes - CD extends DataValue with attributes: - codedText : String - codingSchemeName: String - Text extends DataValue with the attribute: - originalText : String - SimpleText with no attribute, just specification Now I want a Composition with the attributes meaning and name set. After Marshalling it with my xml mapping (included in the first email) I get this transformation: <COMPOSITION> <meaning> <codingSchemeName>AntonBrass</codingSchemeName> <codeValue>anton</codeValue> </meaning> <name xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:type="SIMPLETEXT"> <originalText>anton</originalText> </name> </COMPOSITION> The attribute name behaves like I want it to, setting the xsi:type I defined in the mapping as map-to, meaning is not. I want instead it like this: <COMPOSITION> <meaning xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:type="CV"> <codingSchemeName>AntonBrass</codingSchemeName> <codeValue>anton</codeValue> </meaning> <name xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:type="SIMPLETEXT"> <originalText>anton</originalText> </name> </COMPOSITION> Is this possible anyhow? I played with the different settings of the marshaller, but with no success. The reference guide doesn't help me, because I have entirely the same mapping and do not want a auto-naming that is derived by the class. If you want I can create a dummy project with the example. Feel free to ask further questions! Thank you a lot! Best regards Anton Brass ----- Original Message ----- From: "Werner Guttmann" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] XSI:TYPE behavior > Hi Anton, > > let me ask you a few questions ..... > > Anton Brass wrote: >> Hey there, >> >> I want to use castor for simply mapping existing java objects to xml. >> >> >> But my problem is, that some objects are adding xsi:type >> automatically and others not. With others I do not mean the simple >> types directly supported by castor, but own classes, which are not >> much different to the classes, which are working correctly. > Are those classes by any chance part of a class hierarchy ? > >> I don't really understand how I can switch on/off the xsi:type or can >> impact the output for this attribute, even after reading the >> ReferenceGuide chapter many times. > Well, your options are limited in some way, but there are options. > > a) Turn it off completely (option on the Marshaller). > b) Read > > http://castor.org/reference/html/XML%20data%20binding.html#xml.mapping.mappingfile.xsitype > > again, and try to play with the options defined (and explained) therein. > > c) Showcase a small (self-sufficient) problem that allows us to answer > your questions more specifically. > >> I want that every element which is a field of a class A and type of >> class B adds my defined map-to type in form of the xsi:type >> attribute. > Why would you want that just at this very location ? Why not let Castor > decide if it's needed ? Again, a short example might be helpful. > >> I added all my classes and the mapping files I use as attachment in >> this E-Mail. The class and its extensions that are not working the >> same way like the others is called "es.ehrflex.core.en13606.text.CD". > Sorry, but you will have to break down things so that your questions are > a bit moire specific. > >> I'm using Castor 1.3rc1 (and others tested), JDK 1.6, Apache Tomcat >> 6.0.0.20, Maven 2 and GWT 1.6.4. > Why not switch to 1.3 final ? > >> >> Thank you a lot for any helpful suggestions. >> >> Best regards >> >> Anton Brass >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
