Hi Evgeny, thanks for your great suggest! I think it should works also for me. I'll try it :-) Davide
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Evgeny Ryabitskiy < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > I can see same problems I have met almost a year before. > Also have module architecture... > > First of all don't use Configuration.initializeSharedConfiguration( > fileConf ); > It's not for module applications... > > You could use something like this: > > Configuration conf = new DefaultConfiguration("module1-cayenne.xml"); > conf.initialize(); //mandatory. Means "load and parse my xml". > DataDomain module1Domain = conf.getDomain(); //actually it's a > factory for DataContext based on configuration > DataContext module1Ctx = module1Domain.createDataContext(); //here we > go! we got context for module1 > > > > Evgeny. > > > > 2010/6/21 mr.abanjo <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > i'm working with a lot' of web sites. Most of them must connect to the > some > > databases to read / write data. > > So, for every kind of "content", i've created a library (jar) that > manages > > the database's operations. > > For example, user, news, meteo ecc.. are managed in different libraries > > included in different war (one for each webapp). > > In this way, i have a single code to mantain, and if i must fix some > error i > > can change the code in a single place, and all webapps get the fix when i > > recreate the war. > > Now, the problem is that i want to let the library to be indipendent from > > the webapps that use it. In the jar i put the cayenne.xml and the > > corresponding datamap, but if a webapp need to load different kind of > data > > (es meteo, and news) in the war i have more than one "cayenne.xml" > file.(es > > meteo_cayenne.xml, news_cayenne.xml). > > I can use different names for them but what's happen when i call: > > > > Configuration.initializeSharedConfiguration( fileConf ); > > > > for each file? > > Is this the right way? > > > > Also i can leave the datamap in the library, and the cayenne.xml file in > the > > webapp, using different "domains" declared in it. But in this way, the > > library is not completly indipendent. What i want to obtain is that the > > webapp don't know nothing about a database/cayenne (except declaring the > > jndi connection). > > There is a way to reach this objective? > > > > Thanks, > > Davide > > >
