Using cayenne in two different webapps in the same TomCat instance
Is it OK to have two different cayenne-based webapps in the same TomCat both 
use the same source code and the same database? If so, what do we need to do to 
allow this to work? 
We have an application that consists of 2 webapps that run in the same tomcat 
instance.
The share the same code via symlinks in the source code base. There are 2 
webapps because one of them needs to be password protected and the other needs 
to be publicly available.
We are using cayenne 3.0M6 and Tomcat 6.0.20. (We used to use Cayenne 1.1 and 
Tomcat 4.0.6 without this issue showing up.)  
The problem occurs when we access one of the web apps then the other, in either 
order. If you access the first webapp and then access the second (or vice 
versa) you get a peculiar ClassCastException which says that an object returned 
from a cayenne querycannot be cast to the class that we expect to be able to 
cast it to. 
We get the problem the right away, in our attempt to get ahold of the object 
that represents the current user which is a root that we use to fault in lots 
of other objects. 
It seems that we end up with two different class loaders, perhaps one for each 
webapp? 
When you examine the offending object you find that:     
object.getClass().getName()  == "main.SystemUser"BUT  
object.getClass().hashCode() != main.SystemUser.class.hashCode()
You also find that:     object.getClass().getClassLoader().toString() == 
main.SystemUser.class.getClassLoader().toString()   BUT 
object.getClass().getClassLoader().hashCode() != 
main.SystemUser.class.getClassLoader().hashCode()
 In each case getClassLoader().toString() == 
org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader,                                   
          delegate: false, repositories: /WEB-INF/classes
This seems to indicate that cayenne is returning objects constructed using two 
different instances of the WebappClassLoader, perhaps each assocated with a 
different class loader. 
Our application previously used Cayenne 1.1 and we don't think that this 
happened, perhaps because a separate instance was created for each webapp, but 
cayenne 3.0 is trying to share (or something like that).




      

Reply via email to