Fixed per CAY-1881. 3.2 fix is still not released, but the Modeler can be assembled from sources.
Andrus On Aug 7, 2014, at 7:47 PM, Lon Varscsak <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, cool. I think that's what I used before. I come from the land of > WebObjects/EOF/WOnder and I think 3.2 had some goodness that makes me feel > more at home. :P > > It looks like 3.2's version of Modeler for OSX isn't running with Java 7 > because I get a major.minor error when trying to use jtds. I'm running the > plain java version with no issues (other than it looks like a java app :D). > > -Lon > > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Let’s start a vote on dev then :) >> >> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to see 3.1 made final soon. We aren't allowed to use Beta or >>> Release Candidate versions for our production deployments. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, 3.2 has definitely moved ahead of 3.1 a lot. Tons of new great >>>> stuff. And we should make 3.2M2 rather soon - it has even more of it. >>>> >>>> Having said that, 3.1 is super stable. The next release of 3.1 will >>>> hopefully be a “final”. For some it may be a benefit. If you go this >> way, >>>> use RC1 of course, which is the latest on the 3.1 branch. >>>> >>>> Andrus >>>> >>>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:54 AM, John Huss <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 3.2! >>>>> On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new >>>> project. >>>>>> Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new >>>>>> project? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Lon >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
