Hi Michael!

Thanks for the pointer. I did try to use your AggregateUtils with Cayenne 4.0 a 
while back but it’s not API compatible with 4.0. I was able to get it to work 
with some changes, but turned out I was creating a new DB connection for each 
DB function invocation and some other things I didn’t quite like. So I ended up 
constructing my own utility class that uses EJBQL (still determining how 
sensible that was).

https://bitbucket.org/loftfar/jambalaya/src/22d799925a2c110b4823b36d335889e2ccfc3d06/src/main/java/jambalaya/CayenneUtils.java?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default

But thanks for CBE! IT’s been one of the most useful resources for me while 
learning Cayenne.

Cheers,
- hugi



> On 29. feb. 2016, at 18:09, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> PS. I think the code works correctly, but let me know if it doesn't.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Hugi,
>> 
>> I'm not sure if this will work for 4.0 (since earlier you said you are
>> using it), but this is what I'd use for 3.1:
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/mrg/cbe/blob/master/FetchingObjects/Aggregates/src/main/java/cbe/fetching/utilities/AggregateUtils.java
>> 
>> If you have A->>B, you'd construct a SelectQuery to fetch B's where toA =
>> your A object.  Basically, invert your query and count the matches.
>> Something like:
>> 
>> SelectQuery selectQuery = new SelectQuery(B.class);
>> selectQuery.setQualifier(ExpressionFactory.matchExp("toA", a));
>> int countOfB = AggregateUtils.count(dataContext, selectQuery);
>> 
>> Some other example uses:
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/mrg/cbe/blob/master/FetchingObjects/Aggregates/src/main/java/cbe/fetching/Aggregates.java
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Hugi Thordarson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Is there any simple way or me to count the number of destination objects
>>> of a to-many relationship? (without fetching) If not, is there some way to
>>> generate an expression from a relationship, so I can use that expression in
>>> my own counting functions?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> - hugi
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to