Okay, that’s where I ended up (so I’m glad I was on the right track)…my servlet that I’m using gets all of it’s values from the init parameters and the only way I know to set them programmatically (no web-xml) is to use a ServletHolder. Thoughts?
I might be able to create a subclass and do some tricks. -Lon On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lon, > > Yeah, we need to make this a bit more transparent (servlet-related API is > still minimal, as we focsed on other areas like web services). But you are > going in the right direction. JettyModule.contributeServlets(Binder) is > what you need. We wrap the servlet in Bootique MappedServlet class to > attach the URL mapping. So the whole thing may look like this: > > public class App implements Module { > > @Override > public void configure(Binder binder) { > Set<String> urlPatterns = Collections.singleton("/*"); > MyServlet servlet = new MyServlet(); > JettyModule.contributeServlets(binder).addBinding().toInstance(new > MappedServlet(servlet, urlPatterns)); > } > } > > Since you create the servlet in the code, you don't need init parameters. > Instead you treat the servlet as a Java object, and pass anything you need > in constructor or via setters. (The whole point is to avoid web.xml). > > We may improve this API in the future (a bit too much code for my liking; > also servlet has to be instantiated and initialized manually instead of > using injection). But it is fully functional and will get you going. > > Andrus > > > On Mar 9, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Lon Varscsak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I also need to add init parameters to my servlet, but I only know how to > do > > it through ServletHolder (which bootique doesn’t support). > > > > -Lon > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Lon Varscsak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Since I can’t find an email list for Bootique… :D > >> > >> How do I add a servlet to Jetty through Bootique. I see > >> JettyModule.contributeServlets(Binder)…but I can’t figure it out. DI is > >> still magical to me. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Lon > >> > >
