What about the maven2 group/artifact id?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Ralph Goers<[email protected]> wrote: > The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely have to > be considered whether we would want to take on the package renaming right > now. > > The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't clear that that was > correct. The minimum JDK for 2.0 has already been changed to 1.4 since some > of the code actually required that version to run. > > Ralph > > On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:24 AM, James Carman wrote: > >> Are they going to change the package name? >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not >>> been >>> released and the developers are considering making the minimum version >>> JDK >>> 5. We are interested in getting feedback from the community however >>> before >>> this change is made. So please respond with your thoughts on this. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
