Yet another dependency to add to the mix. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Cogen, David - 1008 - MITLL <co...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > > ________________________________________ > From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On Behalf > Of James Carman [ja...@carmanconsulting.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:30 PM > To: Commons Users List > Subject: Re: [Primitives] Does anyone use this? > > Premature optimization with JDK5. I'd say stick to the JDK classes if > you can and only try to beef up space/performance if you need to. > > > Normally I agree about evils of premature optimization. But ArrayListInt is > practically a drop-in replacement for ArrayList<Integer> and I see no reason > not to use it if it is supported and reliable. > > My test of 2 billion accesses (reads and writes) ran in 35% of the time when > I used ArrayListInt vs. ArrayList<Integer>. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
