On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Yasser Al Masri <ysralma...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks. Is it much of trouble to post a little snippet explaining this? > <snip/>
Perhaps better if you post where you are, so we start with the right assumptions about your usecase. -Rahul > ________________________________ > From: Rahul Akolkar > To: Commons Users List <user@commons.apache.org>; Yasser Al Masri > <ysralma...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 8:36 PM > Subject: Re: [scxml] Any Feed From Invoked State Machine Back to Invoker? > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Yasser Al Masri <ysralma...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For synchronous communication between invoker and invoked machines we >> usually need to pass back a variable or some sort of signal to tell it that a >> result of a particular operation is so and so. Is there a way to accomplish >> this? > <snip/> > > Event correlation using application-specific naming patterns or > payload properties is one way. Event payloads are open-ended and their > interpretation is upto the application. > > -Rahul > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
