On 03/03/2012 18:32, Chris Vest wrote: > Hey guys, > > I've written an object pool myself, and make a short comparison between it > and commons-pool in my documentation, to help people choose between the two. > It's here http://chrisvest.github.com/stormpot/ (under the "why choose..." > headline) > and some more here > https://github.com/chrisvest/stormpot/blob/master/package-info.md (under > the "Introduction" headline) > > Let me know if I've misrepresented commons-pool. I don't want to spread > misinformation.
A few areas where your statements are not entirely accurate: Thread safety: - Commons Pool *is* thread safe. APIs: - There are two types of Pool hence two APIs (ObjectPool and KeyedObjectPool). Each type has multiple implementations. Users are free to use implementation specific methods *if they want to* but to suggest that there are many implementations each with a different API is not correct. Performance: Any numbers to back up the claim that Commons Pool is less performant? It wouldn't surprise me on multi-core machines - that is after all one of the primary goals of Commons Pool 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
