Well, I'd be inclined to use the library written by the same people who
maintain the spec: http://www.json.org/java/index.html
On 4/10/13 11:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Note that json.org is a spec, not an implementation.
Gary
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Pitts <[email protected]>wrote:
Do you mean "a common way" or "the Commons way". json.org is pretty much
canonical when it comes to JSON encoding. How much more common do you need?
I realize that this is the apache commons user list, and it wouldn't hurt
to have Commons support JSON better. However as an pragmatic engineer, I
would use json.org before asking the apache community to duplicate that
functionality, unless there are issues with licensing for you. I don't know
off the top of my head what license json.org uses.
On 4/10/13 2:37 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
Actually, when I was talking about the best way, I was asking for a
"common" way.
On 10 April 2013 02:39, Daniel Pitts <[email protected]> wrote:
I might suggest looking into the json.org library.
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
user-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<[email protected]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
