[email protected] wrote: > Jorge, > > You could create a different named method for each primitive array > type. Would be a pain to use in a generic fashion.
[snip] I agree with a method returning explicitly an array, but that has been nonsense in first place. As I already pointed out, the existing <T> T get(Class<T> cls, String key); would have been completely enough. See my examples from the last mail. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
