There have been suggestions in the past for a v3, so if you search the mailing lists, you may find a good place to start.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 07:15, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > VFS is stable and maintained. Feel free to provide PRs :-) > > Gary > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 03:00 Jurrie Overgoor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > At the moment, my team is using Apache VFS2 in production. We use it for > > HTTP(S) and for (S)FTP. However, we are having some problems with this. > > > > SFTP is implemented using JSCH. That project now seems abandoned. I had > > to cook up my own fix for issue JSCH-111 (see > > https://github.com/Jurrie/jsch-111-bugfix). > > > > HTTP(S) is implemented using Apache Httpclient 3.x, which is end of life > > (see https://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/). Its replacement is Apache > > HttpComponents, but that is not a plug-and-play direct replacement. > > > > That leads me to wonder whether Apache VFS2 is still under active > > development? Are there any plans to fix the above things? Is it still > > advised to use Apache VSF2 in production software? > > > > With kind regards, > > > > Jurrie > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
