On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:45:31PM +0000, Jason Davies wrote: > On 3 Jan 2009, at 13:41, Noah Slater wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 11:58:59PM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote: >>> GET is meant to be idempotent - >>> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html. >> >> So? How does the idempotency of GET affect the UUID service? > > Quoting from the RFC: A sequence that never has side effects is > idempotent, by definition (provided that no concurrent operations are > being executed on the same set of resources). > > Hence the UUID service is idempotent, as it has no side effects.
My point exactly, glad we're all in agreement! Heh heh. -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
