+0.5 (for removing)

I do think the feature is nice for things like testing. Having
actually read and played around with the underlying code, the benefit
to code ratio seems rather small, especially considering that we're
constantly saying "Don't use it".

Paul

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Jason Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 02:36, Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Christopher Lenz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, um, can we get this change backed out?
>>>
>>
>> +1 on deleting the feature altogether. It's parallel code in places
>> and doesn't provide any functionality.
>
> +1
>
> --
> Jason Davies
>
> www.jasondavies.com
>
>

Reply via email to