On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:00:20PM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote: > 1. Remove the _temp_view facility completely, because you can use a > temporary _design view, at which point you should understand the > performance implications, and it cleans up the code.
+0 > 2. Leave it as _temp_view, because it does the equivalent of view > create/query/delete view in a single POST, and you can document the > performance issue. +1 > 3. Change it to _slow_view, because compared to _temp_view, the name > should act as an immediate warning for people who haven't read the > documentation. -1 -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
