On 21 Jan 2009, at 22:43, Chris Anderson wrote:

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Christopher Lenz <[email protected]> wrote:

One thing that's clear is overwhelming objection against the renaming to _slow_view. There seems to be a slight preference towards removing temp
views altogether, but I think that may take more discussion.

I would suggest we move forward here by first backing out the change to
_slow_view.

+1

+1

I'd be okay with forcing the client libs to implement temp views if we'd document this pattern thoroughly, provide a reference implementation in couch.js and maybe other languages. Since Chris and Chris maintain both the de-facto Ruby and Python libs and I have dibs in the preferred PHP lib, that seems possible. But let's
leave that for another thread.

Cheers
Jan
--

Reply via email to