On 21 Jan 2009, at 22:43, Chris Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Christopher Lenz <[email protected]>
wrote:
One thing that's clear is overwhelming objection against the
renaming to
_slow_view. There seems to be a slight preference towards removing
temp
views altogether, but I think that may take more discussion.
I would suggest we move forward here by first backing out the
change to
_slow_view.
+1
+1
I'd be okay with forcing the client libs to implement temp views if
we'd document
this pattern thoroughly, provide a reference implementation in
couch.js and maybe
other languages. Since Chris and Chris maintain both the de-facto Ruby
and
Python libs and I have dibs in the preferred PHP lib, that seems
possible. But let's
leave that for another thread.
Cheers
Jan
--