Wojciech Kaczmarek wrote:
2009/4/25 Paul Davis <[email protected]>:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Wojciech Kaczmarek
<[email protected]> wrote:
So the result of CouchApp push are just injected code chunks, right?
What about code size for really complicated macro sets, is it
irrelevant in practice?
Yeah, the code is just injected inline. I wouldn't worry about code
size unless you're doing something fairly strange. For normal use
which includes things like pulling in entire templating systems I've
never heard of an issue.
And what about handmade view servers in other languages? Is function
hashing/storing done by couchdb itself and viewserver:add_fun receives
the function text to execute, but doesn't care about storing?
Yup. The view server doesn't care about the signatures. The logic for
when to reindex what is all handled in Erlang.
HTH,
Paul Davis
