If 30s for the 0.10 test suite is about right, and R12B-3 didn't fsync properly, it sounds like I have my answer.
Thanks Paul, Adam. On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Paul Davis<[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Paul Carey<[email protected]> wrote: >> Paul >> >> I'm not sure I did, so I deleted the install completely, re-installed >> and am running via ./utils/run so I'm pretty sure there's no detritus >> hanging around. >> >> After re-running the test suite 3 times the avg run time on 0.9.1 was >> 47s and and on 0.10 (804278) was 31s. >> > > 30s for the 0.10 futon tests sounds about right to me. There are more > tests, though I haven't seen any other numbers on the time for running > the test suite. > > Hopefully we can start working some basic timing into the build bot > instance that infra is going to build for us. While not an immediate > answer, hopefully it'll help us keep an eye on such things. > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Paul Davis<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Paul, >>> >>> That's most odd. This is the first i've heard of a performance drop >>> after upgrading Erlang. When you re-built CouchDB did you make sure >>> that there weren't old beam files in the build directory? >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Paul Carey<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I've been behind the curve in my otp version, running R12B (5.6.3) >>>> until just now. >>>> >>>> Using R12B, the 0.9.1 test suite ran to completion in about 12s. >>>> >>>> I've just upgraded to R13B01 (5.7.2) and now the 0.9.1 test suite >>>> takes about 50s - 60s to complete. This is a big difference. Is it >>>> expected or have I got problems? >>>> >>>> I'm running OS X 10.5.8 and simply ran ./configure without any flags >>>> when building both Erlang and CouchDB. I re-ran ./configure and make >>>> for CouchDB after upgrading Erlang. >>>> >>>> Many thanks >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>> >> >
