Hi Paul, I think this is a slightly different use case though. The framework sits as a layer between the user and the db; I don't want the user to wrap their data to use the framework. Rather, I want to annotate a user generated document with additional data - which is essentially what the existing underscored names currently do.
Regards, /julian. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote: > > Julian, > > There have been a few discussions on this. In the past the suggestion > has always been to nest any user specified data in an object to avoid > name collisions. Something akin to: > > { > "_id": "foo", > "_rev": "2-32acbd", > "plink_framework_property_a": 23, > "plink_framework_property_b": "2009-10-29T00:00:00Z", > "body": { > // user data here > } > } > > Paul Davis >
