Even more confusing:
GET /images/a0cbe43b55828d33320cf6cbd40bdb81?attachments=true
does include the data part base84 encoded
and return {
base64: --data;
}
works as well.
why is the combination of those not possible?
Jan
Am 28.05.2010 13:10, schrieb Robert Newson:
Attachments aren't available through show functions. JSON and binary
don't place nicely together. What makes it a little more confusing is
that you'll see the _attachments object in your document with
everything *except* the data. :)
B.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jan Prieser<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to deliver an attachment through a show function?
i've tried this with no success:
GET
/images/_design/images/_show/onlineimage/a0cbe43b55828d33320cf6cbd40bdb81?attachments=true
function (doc, req) {
if (doc.type == "image"&& doc.online == "online") {
return {
body: doc._attachments["filename"].data,
headers: { "content-type" :
doc._attachments["filename"].content_type}
}
}
else {
return 'not found or offline';
}
}
Reason is to rewrite this URL in varnish cache and only deliver images which
are flagged online in doc.online.
My application would ask for http://varnish/image/<imagedocid> and only get
online images.
I'm trying to avoid an extra http roundtrip through the application server.
any ideas how to accomplish this scenario?
regards,
jan prieser
