Hmm... I just did a fresh download and make dev, and all the tests ran
fine the first time.
However the second time I received this failure:
compact failure 2086ms
1. Assertion failed: db.info().disk_size < deletesize
Then a different failure the third time running all the tests:
rev_stemming error 79ms
1. Exception raised: {"error":"file_exists","reason":"The database
could not be created, the file already exists."}
FWIW, I did completely clear my browser cache, stopped my other
CouchDB 0.11 instance, and I'm now running the 1.0 artefact on port
5984.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:58 PM, J Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>
>> Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough earlier. (^w^) That log was captured
>> while running all the tests in Futon.
>>
>> I'm running the test suite in Firefox 3.6.3, and the table contains
>> the following after I run:
>> http://friendpaste.com/4v4ryhrweSu1PRifAVBMlQ
>>
>
> That does look bad.
>
> Are you sure you are running a good install of CouchDB? Just now while
> testing the 0.11.1 release I had a bunch of errors and it turned out I was
> running CouchDB 1.0 with the 0.11.1 test suite. (This can happen if you do
> the make install step)
>
> But since you are running using utils/run it's probably not a version
> mismatch.
>
> Did you run `make dev` before running utils/run?
>
> The other thing to do is to clear your browser cache.
>
> Chris
>
>> -Zach
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> The test page reports "success" for each test. Some tests verify that
>>> error conditions are handled, so the log always contains some alarming
>>> error messages. Hopefully that's what happened here.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On 7 Jul 2010, at 22:57, J Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Friends,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm having trouble running the browser tests for the 1.0 artefact...
>>>>> Have I done something silly?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean? Are there failures when you run them?
>>>>
>>>>> I'm on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with Erlang R13B04, and running via the
>>>>> ./utils/run script.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a link to the logs from when I ran all the tests:
>>>>> http://friendpaste.com/2SmffccO5aRrLcz5f1XZgV
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The logs look ok to me (didn't read them, but it looks like the test
>>>> suite successfully finished.)
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any other data I should provide?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Zach
>>>>
>>>
>
>
