>Why not just use the attachment name as the document id? Docs name can be not uniq.
2010/8/13 Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com>: > Why not just use the attachment name as the document id? You could > double it up or just use an unchanging name for the actual Couch > attachment identifier, e.g. > > /docs/mycoolattachment1/content > /docs/anotherniftyattachment/content > ... > > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, faust 1111 <faust...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes it's possible but each time when i put attachment i must create >> new doc and remember doc id +attachment_name >> if i keep all attachments in one doc i can remember only >> attachment_name, its simple. >> >> >> 2010/8/13 Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>: >>> What about a separate db for your attachments, with one attachment per doc? >>> >>> On 13 Aug 2010, at 12:03, faust 1111 wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guy's. >>>> I have idea keep all attachments in separate db, separate from docs >>>> (its allow me replicate only docs without attachments), >>>> and in doc save link to attachment in separate db. >>>> >>>> is it possible put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc? >>>> Thanks for help! >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com> >
