Unless your app can deal with querying the view stale.
On Wednesday, 20 November 2013 at 21:56, Mark Hahn wrote: > I meant http view requests were blocked. It is waiting for the view > rebuild. > > I'm can't type what I'm thinking today. > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Mark Hahn <m...@reevuit.com> wrote: > > > never mind. I wasn't talking about the file level at all. I meant that > > http read requests are blocked after http update requests. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > "DB reads are blocked by DB updates at the http level." > > > > > > Nope, there's a process that can read the database and a separate one > > > for writing to it. Writing to an append only file is obviously > > > serialized but there's no need to block reads. > > > > > > B. > > > > > > > > > On 20 November 2013 21:35, Mark Hahn <m...@reevuit.com> wrote: > > > > > Database writes are not coupled to view updates. > > > > > > > > > > > > I understand now, you are talking about file read/write level. DB reads > > > > are blocked by DB updates at the http level. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Robert Newson <robert.new...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > "A write requires updating views and reads have to wait for the > > > > > update" > > > > > > > > > > Is not true. Database writes are not coupled to view updates. > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > > > > > > > On 20 Nov 2013, at 20:59, Mark Hahn <m...@reevuit.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A write requires updating views and reads have > > > > > > to wait for the update > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
