To be clearer, startkey_docid is *ignored* unless you also specify startkey.
B.
On 5 December 2013 23:23, Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote:
> The question is meaningless, let me explain.
>
> startkey_docid (and endkey_docid) are used for selecting ranges where
> the view key is the same, it is *not* a separate index. Views are in
> key order only.
>
> under the covers, the true view key is actually [emitted_key_order,
> doc._id], the rows are unique in the b+tree.
>
> B.
>
>
> On 5 December 2013 23:14, Nathan Vander Wilt <nate-li...@calftrail.com> wrote:
>> Let's say for every doc I `emit([doc.user])` and, when a user requests a
>> document ID I have my middleware `GET
>> …/docs_by_user?startkey=[req.user.name]&endkey=[req.user.name,{}]&include_docs=true&limit=1&startkey_docid=req.param.id`.
>> I return the row's doc or 404 if the range is empty. Basically I'm giving
>> each user read access to "their own" objects without having to give them
>> their own database.
>>
>> I'm wondering though, if `startkey_docid` is as scalable as `startkey`
>> itself. IIRC, the doc ids are simply a final extra group level internally
>> (clearly they determine sort order) but if this behaves more like
>> `&skip=lots` instead, then of course relying heavily on the query above
>> would be something of an anti-pattern.
>>
>> (Bonuses: If this _is_ still a reasonable solution, I'm assuming I can't
>> simplify my emit/query to use `&key=name&startkey_docid=id` right?
>> Alternatively, would it be more efficient but just-as-correct to emit plain
>> string keys and limit my range to `&startkey=name&endkey=name+"\0"?)
>>
>> thanks,
>> -natevw
